commit | aca19304037329608b61a7f9d89a96e747bdc194 | [log] [tgz] |
---|---|---|
author | David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> | Mon Aug 29 12:45:27 2022 -0400 |
committer | Boringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> | Wed Aug 31 19:50:28 2022 +0000 |
tree | 06d663610b3a30c11c492d97e9aa3ea335098730 | |
parent | 5f627e569fd8048c4912feb24b0fb1f5494b18c0 [diff] |
Incorporate OS entropy on FIPS CTR-DRBG reseed, not just init. For various reasons, our FIPS mode build will sometimes seed from RDRAND instead of the OS. (And, when https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52527 relands, there'll be another non-OS source.) To help with this, https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/37664 made the FIPS mode rand_get_seed opportunistically incorporate OS entropy when available. Originally, it just XORed into the original entropy. Then https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44305 rearranged this so that rand_get_seed had an out_used_cpu (since renamed to out_want_additional input) output, with the caller mixing the entropy in instead, into the personalization input to CTR_DRBG_init. In doing so, that change lost the OS entropy in the CTR_DRBG_reseed calls. Add it back in, using the additional_data parameter. As part of this, move the CRYPTO_sysrand_if_available call back to rand_get_seed, this time as a second output which the caller is responsible for passing into CTR_DRBG_{init,reseed} alongside the main output. Change-Id: Ie3335c74e940c760031a28de932d6fedfe355ea0 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54126 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: