| # Contributing to Matter (formerly Project CHIP) |
| |
| Want to contribute? Great! First, read this page (including the small print at |
| the end). By submitting a pull request, you represent that you have the right to |
| license your contribution to the Connectivity Standards Alliance and the |
| community, and agree by submitting the patch that your contributions are |
| licensed under the [Apache 2.0 license](./LICENSE). Before submitting the pull |
| request, please make sure you have tested your changes and that they follow the |
| project guidelines for contributing code. |
| |
| # Contributing as an Open Source Contributor |
| |
| As an open source contributor you can report bugs and request features in the |
| [Issue Tracker](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/issues), as well |
| as contribute bug fixes and features that do not impact Matter specification as |
| a pull request. For example: ports of Matter to add APIs to alternative |
| programming languages (e.g. Java, JS), hardware ports, or an optimized |
| implementation of existing functionality. For features that impact the |
| specification, please join Matter work group within the Connectivity Standards |
| Alliance. The requirements to become an open source contributor of the |
| [Matter Repository](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip) are: |
| |
| - Agree to the [Code of Conduct](./CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) |
| - Agree to the [License](./LICENSE) |
| - Have signed the |
| [Matter Working Group CLA](https://gist.github.com/clapre/65aa9fc63981da765039e0bb7e8701be) |
| |
| # Contributing as a Connectivity Standards Alliance Matter Working Group Member |
| |
| As a participant of the Connectivity Standards Alliance Matter Working Group, |
| you can attend Working Group meetings, propose changes to the Matter |
| specification, and contribute code for approved updates to the specification. |
| The requirements to become a member of the |
| [Matter Repository](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip) are: |
| |
| - Must be a [Participant member](http://www.zigbeealliance.org/join) or higher |
| of the Connectivity Standards Alliance |
| - Must be a Matter Working Group member |
| - Have signed the Alliance Matter Working Group CLA |
| - Have approval from your company's official approver |
| |
| # Bugs |
| |
| If you find a bug in the source code, you can help us by |
| [submitting a GitHub Issue](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/issues/new). |
| The best bug reports provide a detailed description of the issue and |
| step-by-step instructions for predictably reproducing the issue. Even better, |
| you can |
| [submit a Pull Request](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#submitting-a-pull-request) |
| with a fix. |
| |
| # New Features |
| |
| You can request a new feature by |
| [submitting a GitHub Issue](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/issues/new). |
| If you would like to implement a new feature, please consider the scope of the |
| new feature: |
| |
| - _Large feature_: first |
| [submit a GitHub Issue](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/issues/new) |
| and communicate your proposal so that the community can review and provide |
| feedback. Getting early feedback will help ensure your implementation work |
| is accepted by the community. This will also allow us to better coordinate |
| our efforts and minimize duplicated effort. |
| - _Small feature_: can be implemented and directly |
| [submitted as a Pull Request](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#submitting-a-pull-request). |
| |
| # Contributing Code |
| |
| Matter follows the "Fork-and-Pull" model for accepting contributions. |
| |
| ### Initial Setup |
| |
| Setup your GitHub fork and continuous-integration services: |
| |
| 1. Fork the [Matter repository](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip) |
| by clicking "Fork" on the web UI. |
| |
| 2. All contributions must pass all checks and reviews to be accepted. |
| |
| Setup your local development environment: |
| |
| ```bash |
| # Clone your fork |
| git clone git@github.com:<username>/connectedhomeip.git |
| |
| # Configure upstream alias |
| git remote add upstream git@github.com:project-chip/connectedhomeip.git |
| ``` |
| |
| ### Submitting a Pull Request |
| |
| #### Branch |
| |
| For each new feature, create a working branch: |
| |
| ```bash |
| # Create a working branch for your new feature |
| git branch --track <branch-name> origin/master |
| |
| # Checkout the branch |
| git checkout <branch-name> |
| ``` |
| |
| #### Create Commits |
| |
| ```bash |
| # Add each modified file you'd like to include in the commit |
| git add <file1> <file2> |
| |
| # Create a commit |
| git commit |
| ``` |
| |
| This will open up a text editor where you can craft your commit message. |
| |
| #### Upstream Sync and Clean Up |
| |
| Prior to submitting your pull request, you might want to do a few things to |
| clean up your branch and make it as simple as possible for the original |
| repository's maintainer to test, accept, and merge your work. |
| |
| If any commits have been made to the upstream master branch, you should rebase |
| your development branch so that merging it will be a simple fast-forward that |
| won't require any conflict resolution work. |
| |
| ```bash |
| # Fetch upstream master and merge with your repository's master branch |
| git checkout master |
| git pull upstream master |
| |
| # If there were any new commits, rebase your development branch |
| git checkout <branch-name> |
| git rebase master |
| ``` |
| |
| Now, it may be desirable to squash some of your smaller commits down into a |
| small number of larger more cohesive commits. You can do this with an |
| interactive rebase: |
| |
| ```bash |
| # Rebase all commits on your development branch |
| git checkout <branch-name> |
| git rebase -i master |
| ``` |
| |
| This will open up a text editor where you can specify which commits to squash. |
| |
| #### Push and Test |
| |
| ```bash |
| # Checkout your branch |
| git checkout <branch-name> |
| |
| # Push to your GitHub fork: |
| git push origin <branch-name> |
| ``` |
| |
| This will trigger the continuous-integration checks. You can view the results in |
| the respective services. Note that the integration checks will report failures |
| on occasion. |
| |
| ### Review Requirements |
| |
| #### Documentation Best Practices |
| |
| Matter uses Doxygen to markup (or markdown) all C, C++, Objective C, Objective |
| C++, Perl, Python, and Java code. Read our |
| [Doxygen Best Practices, Conventions, and Style](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/blob/master/docs/style/DOXYGEN.adoc) |
| |
| #### Submit Pull Request |
| |
| Once you've validated the CI results, go to the page for your fork on GitHub, |
| select your development branch, and click the pull request button. If you need |
| to make any adjustments to your pull request, just push the updates to GitHub. |
| Your pull request will automatically track the changes on your development |
| branch and update. |
| |
| #### Merge Requirements |
| |
| - Github Workflows pass |
| - Builds pass |
| - Tests pass |
| - Linting passes |
| - Code style passes |
| |
| When can I merge? After these have been satisfied, a reviewer will merge the PR |
| into master |
| |
| #### Documentation |
| |
| Documentation undergoes the same review process as code See the |
| [Documentation Style Guide](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/blob/master/docs/STYLE_GUIDE.md) |
| for more information on how to author and format documentation for contribution. |
| |
| ## Merge Processes |
| |
| Merges require at least 3 approvals from unique require-reviewers lists, and all |
| CI tests passing. |
| |
| ### Shorter Reviews |
| |
| Development Lead & Vice Leads can merge a change with fewer then the required |
| approvals have been submitted. |
| |
| A separate "fast track" label will be created that will only require a single |
| checkbox to be set, this label shall only be set by the Development Lead, and/or |
| Vice Lead (unless they’re both unavailable, in which case a replacement can be |
| temporarily appointed) |
| |
| "Day" here means "business day" (i.e. PRs on friday do not get fast-tracked |
| faster). |
| |
| ### Fast track types |
| |
| ### Trivial changes |
| |
| Small changes or changes that do not affect the main functionality of the code |
| can be fast tracked immediately. Examples: |
| |
| - Adding/removing documentation (.md files) |
| - Adding tests (may include small reorganization/method adding/changes to |
| enable testability): |
| - certification tests |
| - stability tests |
| - integration tests |
| - functional tests |
| - Test scripts |
| - Additional tests following a pattern (e.g. YAML tests) |
| - Adding/updating/fixing tooling to aid in development |
| - Re-running code generation |
| - Code readability refactors: |
| - renaming enum/classes/structure members |
| - moving constant header location |
| - Obviously trivial build rule changes (e.g. adding missing files to build |
| rules) |
| - Changing comments |
| - Adding/removing includes (include what you need and only what you need |
| rules) |
| - Pulling new third-party repo files |
| - Platform vendors/maintainers adding platform features/logic/bug fixes to |
| their own platforms |
| - Most changes to existing docker files (pulling new versions, reorganizing) |
| - Most changes to new dockerfile version in workflows |
| |
| #### Fast track changes |
| |
| Larger functionality changes are allowed to be fast tracked with these |
| requirements/restrictions: |
| |
| - Require at least 1 day to have passed since the creation of the PR |
| - Require at least 1 checkmark from someone familiar with the code or problem |
| space |
| - This requirement shall be dropped after a PR is 3 days old with stale or |
| no feedback. |
| - Code is sufficiently covered by automated tests (or impossible to |
| automatically test with a very solid reason for this - e.g. changes to BLE |
| parameters cannot be automatically tested, but should have been manually |
| verified) |
| |
| Fast tracking these changes will involve resolving any obviously 'resolved' |
| comments (judgment call here: were they replied to or addressed) and merging the |
| change. |
| |
| Any "request for changes" marker will always be respected unless obviously |
| resolved (i.e. author marked "requesting changes because of X and X was done in |
| the PR") |
| |
| - This requirement shall be dropped after a PR is 3 days old with stale or no |
| feedback. |