)]}'
{
  "commit": "31425c58d167784ac97f31425917acb06930eb40",
  "tree": "d760c1dc1fd731f28f931b66dfabb0e6d3026150",
  "parents": [
    "673806aef1cc496ea84abe32e37f71810d8a6415"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Marcin Niestroj",
    "email": "m.niestroj@emb.dev",
    "time": "Wed Jan 05 23:02:51 2022 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Carles Cufí",
    "email": "carles.cufi@nordicsemi.no",
    "time": "Tue Jan 11 11:53:09 2022 +0100"
  },
  "message": "soc: esp32: use SoC name as IDF target instead of board name\n\nSo far board name was used as IDF target. This worked, as the only board\nin tree that is based on \u0027esp32\u0027 SoC is actually \u0027esp32\u0027.\n\nUse CONFIG_SOC instead of CONFIG_BOARD, so that new boards based on\n\u0027esp32\u0027 SoC can be successfully introduced both downstream or upstream.\n\nSigned-off-by: Marcin Niestroj \u003cm.niestroj@emb.dev\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "8f589f7e3f90aeb2e6a9129ebdd33901245153a3",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "soc/xtensa/esp32/CMakeLists.txt",
      "new_id": "604bf6c7205968a4c9b15ece2dff61218305bda8",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "soc/xtensa/esp32/CMakeLists.txt"
    }
  ]
}