Modify the name of a private function to reflect what it actually does (#1119)
diff --git a/queue.c b/queue.c
index dd302c9..1a14c74 100644
--- a/queue.c
+++ b/queue.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
* other tasks that are waiting for the same mutex. This function returns
* that priority.
*/
- static UBaseType_t prvGetDisinheritPriorityAfterTimeout( const Queue_t * const pxQueue ) PRIVILEGED_FUNCTION;
+ static UBaseType_t prvGetHighestPriorityOfWaitToReceiveList( const Queue_t * const pxQueue ) PRIVILEGED_FUNCTION;
#endif
/*-----------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -1844,13 +1844,13 @@
* has timed out the priority should be disinherited
* again, but only as low as the next highest priority
* task that is waiting for the same mutex. */
- uxHighestWaitingPriority = prvGetDisinheritPriorityAfterTimeout( pxQueue );
+ uxHighestWaitingPriority = prvGetHighestPriorityOfWaitToReceiveList( pxQueue );
/* vTaskPriorityDisinheritAfterTimeout uses the uxHighestWaitingPriority
* parameter to index pxReadyTasksLists when adding the task holding
* mutex to the ready list for its new priority. Coverity thinks that
* it can result in out-of-bounds access which is not true because
- * uxHighestWaitingPriority, as returned by prvGetDisinheritPriorityAfterTimeout,
+ * uxHighestWaitingPriority, as returned by prvGetHighestPriorityOfWaitToReceiveList,
* is capped at ( configMAX_PRIORITIES - 1 ). */
/* coverity[overrun] */
vTaskPriorityDisinheritAfterTimeout( pxQueue->u.xSemaphore.xMutexHolder, uxHighestWaitingPriority );
@@ -2362,7 +2362,7 @@
#if ( configUSE_MUTEXES == 1 )
- static UBaseType_t prvGetDisinheritPriorityAfterTimeout( const Queue_t * const pxQueue )
+ static UBaseType_t prvGetHighestPriorityOfWaitToReceiveList( const Queue_t * const pxQueue )
{
UBaseType_t uxHighestPriorityOfWaitingTasks;