Fix comments in emboss_arithmetic.h.
diff --git a/runtime/cpp/emboss_arithmetic.h b/runtime/cpp/emboss_arithmetic.h
index 9bb209a..e7b6a98 100644
--- a/runtime/cpp/emboss_arithmetic.h
+++ b/runtime/cpp/emboss_arithmetic.h
@@ -70,8 +70,9 @@
// the arguments. Unfortunately, C++11 std::initializer_list is not
// constexpr, and C++11 constexpr does not allow iteration.
//
-// Instead, for "small" numbers of arguments (up to 64, at time of writing), we
-// have generated overloads of the form:
+// Instead, for "small" numbers of arguments (up to 64, at time of writing,
+// controlled by OVERLOADS in generators/all_known.py), we have generated
+// overloads of the form:
//
// template <typename T0, ... typename TN>
// inline constexpr bool AllKnown(T0 v0, ... TN vN) {
@@ -198,11 +199,12 @@
// constexpr, and C++11 constexpr does not allow iteration.
//
// Instead, we have a small number of hand-written overloads and a large
- // number (61, at time of writing) of generated overloads, which use O(lg(N))
- // stack for "small" numbers of arguments (128 or fewer, at time of writing),
- // and O(N) stack for more arguments, but with a much, much smaller constant
- // multiplier: one additional stack frame per 64 arguments, instead of one
- // per argument.
+ // number (59, at time of writing, controlled by OVERLOADS in
+ // generators/maximum_operation_do.py) of generated overloads, which use
+ // O(lg(N)) stack for "small" numbers of arguments (128 or fewer, at time of
+ // writing), and O(N) stack for more arguments, but with a much, much smaller
+ // constant multiplier: one additional stack frame per 64 arguments, instead
+ // of one per argument.
// Maximum of 2-4 elements are special-cased.
template <typename T>
