| /* |
| * Copyright (c) 2022 Project CHIP Authors |
| * All rights reserved. |
| * |
| * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
| * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. |
| * You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| * |
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| * |
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| * limitations under the License. |
| */ |
| |
| /** |
| * @file |
| * This file implements unit tests for aborting existing exchanges (except |
| * one) for a fabric. |
| */ |
| |
| #include "messaging/ExchangeDelegate.h" |
| #include "system/SystemClock.h" |
| #include <lib/support/UnitTestContext.h> |
| #include <lib/support/UnitTestRegistration.h> |
| #include <lib/support/UnitTestUtils.h> |
| #include <messaging/ExchangeContext.h> |
| #include <messaging/ExchangeHolder.h> |
| #include <messaging/ExchangeMgr.h> |
| #include <messaging/tests/MessagingContext.h> |
| #include <protocols/Protocols.h> |
| #include <system/SystemPacketBuffer.h> |
| #include <transport/SessionManager.h> |
| |
| namespace chip { |
| namespace Protocols { |
| |
| // |
| // Let's create a mock protocol that encapsulates a 3 message exchange to test out the ExchangeHolder |
| // and the various states the underlying exchange might be set to, altering the clean-up behavior |
| // the holder will execute depending on those states. |
| // |
| namespace MockProtocol { |
| static constexpr Id Id(VendorId::TestVendor1, 1); |
| |
| enum class MessageType : uint8_t |
| { |
| kMsg1 = 0x01, |
| kMsg2 = 0x02, |
| kMsg3 = 0x03 |
| }; |
| } // namespace MockProtocol |
| |
| template <> |
| struct MessageTypeTraits<MockProtocol::MessageType> |
| { |
| static constexpr const Protocols::Id & ProtocolId() { return MockProtocol::Id; } |
| }; |
| |
| } // namespace Protocols |
| } // namespace chip |
| |
| namespace { |
| |
| using namespace chip; |
| using namespace chip::Messaging; |
| using namespace chip::System; |
| using namespace chip::Protocols; |
| |
| using TestContext = Test::LoopbackMessagingContext; |
| |
| TestContext * gCtx = nullptr; |
| |
| class MockProtocolResponder : public ExchangeDelegate, public Messaging::UnsolicitedMessageHandler |
| { |
| public: |
| enum class BehaviorModifier : uint8_t |
| { |
| kNone = 0x00, |
| kHoldMsg2 = 0x01, |
| kErrMsg2 = 0x02, |
| kExpireSessionBeforeMsg2Send = 0x04, |
| kExpireSessionAfterMsg2Send = 0x08, |
| kExpireSessionAfterMsg3Receive = 0x10, |
| }; |
| |
| template <typename... Args> |
| MockProtocolResponder(BehaviorModifier modifier1, Args &&... args) : |
| mExchangeCtx(*this), mBehaviorModifier(modifier1, std::forward<Args>(args)...) |
| { |
| VerifyOrDie(gCtx != nullptr); |
| gCtx->GetExchangeManager().RegisterUnsolicitedMessageHandlerForProtocol(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::Id, this); |
| ChipLogDetail(ExchangeManager, "[%p] MockProtocolResponder: %p", this, &mExchangeCtx); |
| } |
| |
| MockProtocolResponder(BehaviorModifier modifier = BehaviorModifier::kNone) : mExchangeCtx(*this) |
| { |
| VerifyOrDie(gCtx != nullptr); |
| mBehaviorModifier.Set(modifier); |
| gCtx->GetExchangeManager().RegisterUnsolicitedMessageHandlerForProtocol(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::Id, this); |
| ChipLogDetail(ExchangeManager, "[%p] MockProtocolResponder: %p", this, &mExchangeCtx); |
| } |
| |
| ~MockProtocolResponder() |
| { |
| ChipLogDetail(ExchangeManager, "[%p] ~MockProtocolResponder", this); |
| gCtx->GetExchangeManager().UnregisterUnsolicitedMessageHandlerForProtocol(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::Id); |
| } |
| |
| bool DidInteractionSucceed() { return mInteractionSucceeded; } |
| |
| private: |
| CHIP_ERROR OnMessageReceived(ExchangeContext * ec, const PayloadHeader & payloadHeader, |
| System::PacketBufferHandle && buffer) override; |
| |
| CHIP_ERROR OnUnsolicitedMessageReceived(const PayloadHeader & payloadHeader, ExchangeDelegate *& newDelegate) override |
| { |
| newDelegate = this; |
| return CHIP_NO_ERROR; |
| } |
| |
| void OnResponseTimeout(ExchangeContext * ec) override {} |
| |
| ExchangeHolder mExchangeCtx; |
| BitFlags<BehaviorModifier> mBehaviorModifier = BehaviorModifier::kNone; |
| bool mInteractionSucceeded = false; |
| }; |
| |
| class MockProtocolInitiator : public ExchangeDelegate |
| { |
| public: |
| enum class BehaviorModifier : uint8_t |
| { |
| kNone = 0x00, |
| kHoldMsg3 = 0x01, |
| kErrMsg1 = 0x02, |
| kErrMsg3 = 0x04, |
| kDontSendMsg1 = 0x08, |
| kExpireSessionBeforeMsg1Send = 0x10, |
| kExpireSessionAfterMsg1Send = 0x12, |
| kExpireSessionBeforeMsg3Send = 0x14, |
| kExpireSessionAfterMsg3Send = 0x18, |
| }; |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator(BehaviorModifier modifier = BehaviorModifier::kNone) : mExchangeCtx(*this) |
| { |
| mBehaviorModifier.Set(modifier); |
| ChipLogDetail(ExchangeManager, "[%p] MockProtocolInitiator: %p", this, &mExchangeCtx); |
| } |
| |
| template <typename... Args> |
| MockProtocolInitiator(BehaviorModifier modifier1, Args &&... args) : |
| mExchangeCtx(*this), mBehaviorModifier(modifier1, std::forward<Args>(args)...) |
| { |
| ChipLogDetail(ExchangeManager, "[%p] MockProtocolInitiator: %p", this, &mExchangeCtx); |
| } |
| |
| ~MockProtocolInitiator() { ChipLogDetail(ExchangeManager, "[%p] ~MockProtocolInitiator", this); } |
| |
| CHIP_ERROR StartInteraction(SessionHandle & sessionHandle); |
| |
| bool DidInteractionSucceed() { return mInteractionSucceeded; } |
| |
| private: |
| CHIP_ERROR OnMessageReceived(ExchangeContext * ec, const PayloadHeader & payloadHeader, |
| System::PacketBufferHandle && buffer) override; |
| |
| void OnResponseTimeout(ExchangeContext * ec) override {} |
| |
| ExchangeHolder mExchangeCtx; |
| BitFlags<BehaviorModifier> mBehaviorModifier = BehaviorModifier::kNone; |
| bool mInteractionSucceeded = false; |
| }; |
| |
| CHIP_ERROR MockProtocolResponder::OnMessageReceived(ExchangeContext * ec, const PayloadHeader & payloadHeader, |
| System::PacketBufferHandle && buffer) |
| { |
| CHIP_ERROR err = CHIP_NO_ERROR; |
| |
| if (payloadHeader.HasMessageType(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::MessageType::kMsg1)) |
| { |
| // |
| // This is the first message in the exchange - let's have our holder start managing the exchange by grabbing it. |
| // |
| mExchangeCtx.Grab(ec); |
| |
| if (!mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kHoldMsg2)) |
| { |
| PacketBufferHandle respBuffer = MessagePacketBuffer::New(0); |
| VerifyOrReturnError(!buffer.IsNull(), CHIP_ERROR_NO_MEMORY); |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg2)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->InjectFailure(ExchangeContext::InjectedFailureType::kFailOnSend); |
| } |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionBeforeMsg2Send)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->GetSessionHolder().Release(); |
| mExchangeCtx->OnSessionReleased(); |
| } |
| |
| if (mExchangeCtx) |
| { |
| err = mExchangeCtx->SendMessage(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::MessageType::kMsg2, std::move(respBuffer), |
| SendMessageFlags::kExpectResponse); |
| if (mExchangeCtx) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->ClearInjectedFailures(); |
| } |
| |
| ReturnErrorOnFailure(err); |
| } |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg2Send)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->GetSessionHolder().Release(); |
| mExchangeCtx->OnSessionReleased(); |
| } |
| } |
| else |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->WillSendMessage(); |
| } |
| } |
| else if (payloadHeader.HasMessageType(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::MessageType::kMsg3)) |
| { |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg3Receive)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->GetSessionHolder().Release(); |
| mExchangeCtx->OnSessionReleased(); |
| } |
| |
| mInteractionSucceeded = true; |
| } |
| else |
| { |
| err = CHIP_ERROR_INVALID_MESSAGE_TYPE; |
| } |
| |
| return err; |
| } |
| |
| CHIP_ERROR MockProtocolInitiator::StartInteraction(SessionHandle & sessionHandle) |
| { |
| PacketBufferHandle buffer = MessagePacketBuffer::New(0); |
| VerifyOrReturnError(!buffer.IsNull(), CHIP_ERROR_NO_MEMORY); |
| |
| auto exchange = gCtx->GetExchangeManager().NewContext(sessionHandle, this); |
| VerifyOrReturnError(exchange != nullptr, CHIP_ERROR_NO_MEMORY); |
| |
| // |
| // This is the first exchange in this interaction - let's have our holder start managing the exchange by grabbing it. |
| // |
| mExchangeCtx.Grab(exchange); |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg1)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->InjectFailure(ExchangeContext::InjectedFailureType::kFailOnSend); |
| } |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionBeforeMsg1Send)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->GetSessionHolder().Release(); |
| mExchangeCtx->OnSessionReleased(); |
| } |
| |
| if (!mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kDontSendMsg1)) |
| { |
| auto err = mExchangeCtx->SendMessage(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::MessageType::kMsg1, std::move(buffer), |
| SendMessageFlags::kExpectResponse); |
| if (mExchangeCtx) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->ClearInjectedFailures(); |
| } |
| |
| ReturnErrorOnFailure(err); |
| } |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg1Send)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->GetSessionHolder().Release(); |
| mExchangeCtx->OnSessionReleased(); |
| } |
| |
| return CHIP_NO_ERROR; |
| } |
| |
| CHIP_ERROR MockProtocolInitiator::OnMessageReceived(ExchangeContext * ec, const PayloadHeader & payloadHeader, |
| System::PacketBufferHandle && buffer) |
| { |
| CHIP_ERROR err = CHIP_NO_ERROR; |
| |
| if (payloadHeader.HasMessageType(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::MessageType::kMsg2)) |
| { |
| if (!mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kHoldMsg3)) |
| { |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionBeforeMsg3Send)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->GetSessionHolder().Release(); |
| mExchangeCtx->OnSessionReleased(); |
| } |
| |
| PacketBufferHandle respBuffer = MessagePacketBuffer::New(0); |
| VerifyOrReturnError(!buffer.IsNull(), CHIP_ERROR_NO_MEMORY); |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg3)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->InjectFailure(ExchangeContext::InjectedFailureType::kFailOnSend); |
| } |
| |
| if (mExchangeCtx) |
| { |
| err = mExchangeCtx->SendMessage(chip::Protocols::MockProtocol::MessageType::kMsg3, std::move(respBuffer), |
| SendMessageFlags::kNone); |
| if (mExchangeCtx) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->ClearInjectedFailures(); |
| } |
| |
| ReturnErrorOnFailure(err); |
| } |
| |
| if (mBehaviorModifier.Has(BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg3Send)) |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->GetSessionHolder().Release(); |
| mExchangeCtx->OnSessionReleased(); |
| } |
| |
| mInteractionSucceeded = true; |
| } |
| else |
| { |
| mExchangeCtx->WillSendMessage(); |
| } |
| } |
| else |
| { |
| err = CHIP_ERROR_INVALID_MESSAGE_TYPE; |
| } |
| |
| return err; |
| } |
| |
| void TestExchangeHolder(nlTestSuite * inSuite, void * inContext) |
| { |
| TestContext & ctx = *reinterpret_cast<TestContext *>(inContext); |
| |
| gCtx = &ctx; |
| |
| auto sessionHandle = ctx.GetSessionAliceToBob(); |
| |
| ctx.SetMRPMode(chip::Test::MessagingContext::MRPMode::kResponsive); |
| |
| // |
| // #1: Initiator (AllocExchange) |
| // |
| // The initiator just allocated the exchange, but doesn't send a message on it. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Initiator's holder should correctly abort the exchange since it still owns |
| // it. |
| // |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #1: Initiator (AllocExchange) ----------"); |
| |
| { |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator(MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kDontSendMsg1); |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #2: Initiator --X Msg1 |
| // |
| // Inject a failure to transmit Msg1. This should retain the WillSendMessage flag on the initiator's exchange. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Initiator's holder should correctly abort the exchange since it's still has the |
| // WillSendMessage flag on it. |
| // |
| // |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #2: Initiator --X (SendErr) Msg1 --------- "); |
| |
| { |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator(MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg1); |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err != CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // Service IO AFTER the objects above cease to exist to prevent Msg1 from getting to Responder. This also |
| // flush any pending messages in the queue. |
| // |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #3: Initiator --X (Session Released Before) -- Msg1 |
| // |
| // Inject a release of the session associated with the exchange on the initiator before sending Msg1. This |
| // should just close out the exchange without releasing the ref. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. The initiator's holder should correctly abort the exchange since WillSendMessage |
| // should still be present on the EC. |
| // |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #3: Initiator --X (SessionReleased before) Msg1 --------- "); |
| |
| { |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator(MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionBeforeMsg1Send); |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err != CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // Service IO AFTER the objects above cease to exist to prevent Msg1 from getting to Responder. This also |
| // flush any pending messages in the queue. |
| // |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #4: Initiator --X (SendErr + Session Released After) -- Msg1 |
| // |
| // Inject an error at Msg1 transmission followed by the release of a session (scenario in #21544). This should |
| // just close out the exchange without releasing the ref since the WillSendMessage flag should still be set. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. The initiator's holder should correctly abort the exchange since WillSendMessage |
| // should still be present on the EC. |
| // |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #4: Initiator --X (SendErr + SessionReleased after) Msg1 --------- "); |
| |
| { |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator(MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg1Send, |
| MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg1); |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err != CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // Service IO AFTER the objects above cease to exist to prevent Msg1 from getting to Responder. This also |
| // flush any pending messages in the queue. |
| // |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #5: Initiator >--- Msg1 --X Responder. |
| // |
| // Initiator sends Msg1 to Responder, but we set it up such that Responder doesn't actually |
| // receive the message. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Initiator's holder should correctly abort the exchange since it's waiting for |
| // a response. |
| // |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #5: Initiator >-- Msg1 --X Responder ---------"); |
| |
| { |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // Service IO AFTER the objects above cease to exist to prevent Msg1 from getting to Responder. This also |
| // flush any pending messages in the queue. |
| // |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #6: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder (WillSend) |
| // |
| // Initiator sends Msg1 to Responder, which is received successfully. However, Responder |
| // doesn't send a response right away (calls WillSendMessage() on the EC). |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Initiator's holder should correctly abort the exchange since it's waiting for |
| // a response, and so should the Responder's holder since it has yet to send a message. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #6: Initiator >-- Msg1 --> Responder (WillSend) ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder(MockProtocolResponder::BehaviorModifier::kHoldMsg2); |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #7: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Msg2 (SendErr) X-- Responder |
| // |
| // Inject an error in the responder when attempting to send Msg2. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. The holder on the responder should abort the exchange since |
| // the transmission failed, and the ref is still with the holder. The holder on the initiator |
| // should abort the exchange since it is waiting for a response. |
| // |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #7: Msg2 (SendFailure) X-- Responder ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder(MockProtocolResponder::BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg2); |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #8: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Msg2 (SessionReleased before) X-- Responder |
| // |
| // Release the session right before sending Msg2 on the responder. This should abort the underlying exchange |
| // immediately since neither WillSendMessage or ResponseExpected flags are set. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. The holders on both should just null out their internal reference to the EC. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #8: Msg2 (SessionReleased Before) X-- Responder ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder(MockProtocolResponder::BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionBeforeMsg2Send); |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #9: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Msg2 (SendErr + SessionReleased after) X-- Responder |
| // |
| // Trigger a send error when sending Msg2 from the responder, and release the session immediately after. This should still |
| // preserve the WillSendMessage flags on the exchange and just close out the EC without releasing the ref. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. The holders on both should abort their respective ECs. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #9: Msg2 (SendErr + SessionReleased after) X-- Responder ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder(MockProtocolResponder::BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg2, |
| MockProtocolResponder::BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg2Send); |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #10: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // (WillSend) Initiator <-- Msg2 <-- Responder |
| // |
| // Initiator receives Msg2 back from Responder, but calls WillSend on that EC. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Initiator's holder should correctly abort the exchange since it's waiting |
| // to send a response, and Responder's holder should abort as well since it's waiting for a response. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #10: (WillSend) Initiator <-- Msg2 <-- Responder ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator(MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kHoldMsg3); |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #11: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Initiator <-- Msg2 <-- Responder |
| // Initiator (SessionReleased before) X-- Msg3 |
| // |
| // Release the session right before the initiator sends Msg3. This should abort the underlying EC immediately on the initiator. |
| // |
| // Then destroy both objects. Both holders on the initiator and responder should be pointing to null. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #11: Initiator --X (SessionReleased before) Msg3 ------------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator(MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionBeforeMsg3Send); |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err != CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #12: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Initiator <-- Msg2 <-- Responder |
| // Initiator X (SendErr + SessionReleased after) -- Msg3 |
| // |
| // Trigger a send error on the initiator when sending Msg3, followed by a session release. Since a send was initiated, the ref |
| // is with the initiator's holder and the EC will just close itself out without removing the ref. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. The responder's holder will have a null ref but the initiator's holder will have a non-null ref, |
| // and should abort it. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #12: Initiator --X (SendErr + SessionReleased after) Msg3 ------------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator(MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kErrMsg3, |
| MockProtocolInitiator::BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg3Send); |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #13: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Initiator <-- Msg2 <-- Responder |
| // Initiator >-- Msg3 --> Responder |
| // |
| // Initiator sends final message in exchange to Responder, which is received successfully. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Initiator's holder should NOT abort the underlying exchange since |
| // it has sent the final message in the exchange, while responder's holder should NOT abor the underlying |
| // exchange either since it is not going to send any further messages on the exchange. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #13: Initiator >-- Msg3 --> Responder ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #14: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Initiator <-- Msg2 <-- Responder |
| // Initiator >-- Msg3 --> Responder (SessionReleased) |
| // |
| // Released the session right on reception of Msg3 on the responder. Since there no responses expected or send expected, |
| // the EC aborts immediately. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Both holders should be point to null and should do nothing. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #14: Initiator >-- Msg3 --> Responder (SessionReleased) ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder(MockProtocolResponder::BehaviorModifier::kExpireSessionAfterMsg3Receive); |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| |
| // |
| // Because of the session expiration right after Msg3 is received, it causes an abort of the underlying EC |
| // on the reponder side. This means that Msg3 won't be ACK'ed. Msg3 on the initiator side remains un-acked. Since |
| // the exchange was just closed and not aborted on the initiator side, it is still sitting in the retransmission table |
| // and consequently, the exchange still has a ref-count of 1. If we were to just check the number of active |
| // exchanges, it would still show 1 active exchange. |
| // |
| // This will only be released once the re-transmission table |
| // entry has been removed. To make this happen, drive the IO forward enough that a single re-transmission happens. This |
| // will result in a duplicate message ACK being delivered by the responder, causing the EC to finally get released. |
| // |
| ctx.GetIOContext().DriveIOUntil(System::Clock::Seconds16(5), |
| [&]() { return ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0; }); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #15: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder (WillSend) |
| // Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder (WillSend) |
| // |
| // Similar to #6, except we have Initiator start the interaction again. This validates |
| // ExchangeHolder::Grab in correctly aborting a previous exchange and acquiring a new one. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Both holders should abort the exchange (see #6). |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #15: Initiator >-- Msg1 --> Responder (WillSend) X2 ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder(MockProtocolResponder::BehaviorModifier::kHoldMsg2); |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| |
| err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| |
| // |
| // #16: Initiator --- Msg1 --> Responder |
| // Initiator <-- Msg2 <-- Responder |
| // Initiator >-- Msg3 --> Responder |
| // |
| // X2 |
| // |
| // We do the entire interaction twice. This validates ExchangeHolder::Grab in correctly releasing a reference |
| // to a previous exchange (but not aborting it) and acquiring a new one. |
| // |
| // Then, destroy both objects. Both holders should release their reference without aborting. |
| // |
| { |
| { |
| ChipLogProgress(ExchangeManager, "-------- #16: Initiator >-- Msg3 --> Responder X2 ---------"); |
| |
| MockProtocolInitiator initiator; |
| MockProtocolResponder responder; |
| |
| auto err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| |
| err = initiator.StartInteraction(sessionHandle); |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, err == CHIP_NO_ERROR); |
| |
| ctx.DrainAndServiceIO(); |
| } |
| |
| NL_TEST_ASSERT(inSuite, ctx.GetExchangeManager().GetNumActiveExchanges() == 0); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Test Suite |
| |
| /** |
| * Test Suite that lists all the test functions. |
| */ |
| // clang-format off |
| const nlTest sTests[] = |
| { |
| NL_TEST_DEF("TestExchangeHolder", TestExchangeHolder), |
| |
| NL_TEST_SENTINEL() |
| }; |
| // clang-format on |
| |
| // clang-format off |
| nlTestSuite sSuite = |
| { |
| "Test-TestExchangeHolder", |
| &sTests[0], |
| NL_TEST_WRAP_FUNCTION(TestContext::SetUpTestSuite), |
| NL_TEST_WRAP_FUNCTION(TestContext::TearDownTestSuite), |
| NL_TEST_WRAP_METHOD(TestContext, SetUp), |
| NL_TEST_WRAP_METHOD(TestContext, TearDown), |
| }; |
| // clang-format on |
| |
| } // anonymous namespace |
| |
| /** |
| * Main |
| */ |
| int TestExchangeHolder() |
| { |
| return chip::ExecuteTestsWithContext<TestContext>(&sSuite); |
| } |
| |
| CHIP_REGISTER_TEST_SUITE(TestExchangeHolder); |
