blob: 31fa5d2b752b0370bef9526d27cdf95e4d6f99f5 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016 Intel Corporation
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
*/
#include "test_sched.h"
#include <ksched.h>
#define THREAD_NUM 4
static struct k_thread tdata_prio[THREAD_NUM];
static struct k_thread tdata;
static int last_prio;
static uint8_t tid_num[4];
static struct k_sem sync_sema;
static void thread_entry(void *p1, void *p2, void *p3)
{
last_prio = k_thread_priority_get(k_current_get());
}
static void thread_entry_prio(void *p1, void *p2, void *p3)
{
static int i;
k_sem_take(&sync_sema, K_MSEC(100));
tid_num[i++] = POINTER_TO_INT(p1);
}
/* test cases */
/**
* @brief Validate that the cooperative thread will
* not be preempted
*
* @details Create a cooperative thread with priority higher
* than the current cooperative thread. Make sure that the higher
* priority thread will not preempt the lower priority cooperative
* thread.
*
* @ingroup kernel_sched_tests
*/
void test_priority_cooperative(void)
{
int old_prio = k_thread_priority_get(k_current_get());
/* set current thread to a negative priority */
last_prio = -1;
k_thread_priority_set(k_current_get(), last_prio);
/* spawn thread with higher priority */
int spawn_prio = last_prio - 1;
k_tid_t tid = k_thread_create(&tdata, tstack, STACK_SIZE,
thread_entry, NULL, NULL, NULL,
spawn_prio, 0, K_NO_WAIT);
/* checkpoint: current thread shouldn't preempted by higher thread */
zassert_true(last_prio == k_thread_priority_get(k_current_get()), NULL);
k_sleep(K_MSEC(100));
/* checkpoint: spawned thread get executed */
zassert_true(last_prio == spawn_prio, NULL);
k_thread_abort(tid);
/* restore environment */
k_thread_priority_set(k_current_get(), old_prio);
}
/**
* @brief Validate preemptiveness of preemptive thread
*
* @details Create a preemptive thread which is of priority
* lower than current thread. Current thread is made has preemptive.
* Make sure newly created thread is not preempted. Now create a
* preemptive thread which is of priority higher than current
* thread. Make sure newly created thread is preempted
*
* @ingroup kernel_sched_tests
*/
void test_priority_preemptible(void)
{
int old_prio = k_thread_priority_get(k_current_get());
/* set current thread to a non-negative priority */
last_prio = 2;
k_thread_priority_set(k_current_get(), last_prio);
int spawn_prio = last_prio - 1;
k_tid_t tid = k_thread_create(&tdata, tstack, STACK_SIZE,
thread_entry, NULL, NULL, NULL,
spawn_prio, 0, K_NO_WAIT);
/* checkpoint: thread is preempted by higher thread */
zassert_true(last_prio == spawn_prio, NULL);
k_sleep(K_MSEC(100));
k_thread_abort(tid);
spawn_prio = last_prio + 1;
tid = k_thread_create(&tdata, tstack, STACK_SIZE,
thread_entry, NULL, NULL, NULL,
spawn_prio, 0, K_NO_WAIT);
/* checkpoint: thread is not preempted by lower thread */
zassert_false(last_prio == spawn_prio, NULL);
k_thread_abort(tid);
/* restore environment */
k_thread_priority_set(k_current_get(), old_prio);
}
/**
* @brief Validate scheduling sequence of preemptive threads with start delay
*
* @details Create four preemptive threads which are of priority
* higher than current thread. Make sure that the highest priority
* and longest waiting thread is scheduled first.
*
* @ingroup kernel_sched_tests
*/
void test_priority_preemptible_wait_prio(void)
{
int old_prio = k_thread_priority_get(k_current_get());
k_tid_t tid[THREAD_NUM];
uint8_t tid_chk[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
k_sem_init(&sync_sema, 0, THREAD_NUM);
/* Ensure that this code starts running at the start of a system tick */
k_usleep(1);
/* set current thread to a non-negative priority */
last_prio = K_PRIO_PREEMPT(2);
k_thread_priority_set(k_current_get(), last_prio);
/* the highest-priority thread that has waited the longest */
tid[0] = k_thread_create(&tdata_prio[0], tstacks[0], STACK_SIZE,
thread_entry_prio, INT_TO_POINTER(0), NULL, NULL,
K_PRIO_PREEMPT(0), 0, K_MSEC(10));
/* the highest-priority thread that has waited the shorter */
tid[1] = k_thread_create(&tdata_prio[1], tstacks[1], STACK_SIZE,
thread_entry_prio, INT_TO_POINTER(1), NULL, NULL,
K_PRIO_PREEMPT(0), 0, K_MSEC(20));
/* the lowest-priority thread that has waited longest */
tid[2] = k_thread_create(&tdata_prio[2], tstacks[2], STACK_SIZE,
thread_entry_prio, INT_TO_POINTER(2), NULL, NULL,
K_PRIO_PREEMPT(1), 0, K_MSEC(10));
/* the lowest-priority thread that has waited shorter */
tid[3] = k_thread_create(&tdata_prio[3], tstacks[3], STACK_SIZE,
thread_entry_prio, INT_TO_POINTER(3), NULL, NULL,
K_PRIO_PREEMPT(1), 0, K_MSEC(20));
/* relinquish CPU for above threads to start */
k_sleep(K_MSEC(30));
for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; i++) {
k_sem_give(&sync_sema);
}
zassert_true((memcmp(tid_num, tid_chk, 4) == 0),
"scheduling priority failed");
/* test case tear down */
for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; i++) {
k_thread_abort(tid[i]);
}
/* restore environment */
k_thread_priority_set(k_current_get(), old_prio);
}
extern void idle(void *p1, void *p2, void *p3);
/**
* Validate checking priority values
*
* Our test cases don't cover every outcome of whether a priority is valid,
* do so here.
*
* @ingroup kernel_sched_tests
*/
void test_bad_priorities(void)
{
struct prio_test {
int prio;
void *entry;
bool result;
} testcases[] = {
{ K_IDLE_PRIO, idle, true },
{ K_IDLE_PRIO, NULL, false },
{ K_HIGHEST_APPLICATION_THREAD_PRIO - 1, NULL, false },
{ K_LOWEST_APPLICATION_THREAD_PRIO + 1, NULL, false },
{ K_HIGHEST_APPLICATION_THREAD_PRIO, NULL, true },
{ K_LOWEST_APPLICATION_THREAD_PRIO, NULL, true },
{ CONFIG_MAIN_THREAD_PRIORITY, NULL, true }
};
for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(testcases); i++) {
zassert_equal(_is_valid_prio(testcases[i].prio,
testcases[i].entry),
testcases[i].result, "failed check %d", i);
/* XXX why are these even separate APIs? */
zassert_equal(Z_VALID_PRIO(testcases[i].prio,
testcases[i].entry),
testcases[i].result, "failed check %d", i);
}
}