| .. _release_process: |
| |
| Release Process |
| ############### |
| |
| The Zephyr project releases on a time-based cycle, rather than a feature-driven |
| one. Zephyr releases represent an aggregation of the work of many contributors, |
| companies, and individuals from the community. |
| |
| A time-based release process enables the Zephyr project to provide users with a |
| balance of the latest technologies and features and excellent overall quality. A |
| roughly 4-month release cycle allows the project to coordinate development of |
| the features that have actually been implemented, allowing the project to |
| maintain the quality of the overall release without delays because of one or two |
| features that are not ready yet. |
| |
| The Zephyr release model was loosely based on the Linux kernel model: |
| |
| - Release tagging procedure: |
| |
| - linear mode on main branch, |
| - release branches for maintenance after release tagging. |
| - Each release period will consist of a development phase followed by a |
| stabilization phase. Release candidates will be tagged during the |
| stabilization phase. During the stabilization phase, only stabilization |
| changes such as bug fixes and documentation will be merged unless granted a |
| special exemption by the Technical Steering Committee. |
| |
| - Development phase: all changes are considered and merged, subject to |
| approval from the respective maintainers. |
| - Stabilisation phase: the release manager creates a vN-rc1 tag and the tree |
| enters the stabilization phase |
| - CI sees the tag, builds and runs tests; Test teams analyse the report from the |
| build and test run and give an ACK/NAK to the build |
| - The release owner, with test teams and any other needed input, determines if the |
| release candidate is a go for release |
| - If it is a go for a release, the release owner lays a tag release vN at the |
| same point |
| |
| .. figure:: release_cycle.svg |
| :align: center |
| :alt: Release Cycle |
| :figclass: align-center |
| :width: 80% |
| |
| Release Cycle |
| |
| Development Phase |
| ***************** |
| |
| A relatively straightforward discipline is followed with regard to the merging |
| of patches for each release. At the beginning of each development cycle, the |
| main branch is said to be open for development. At that time, code which is deemed to be |
| sufficiently stable (and which is accepted by the maintainers and the wide community) is |
| merged into the mainline tree. The bulk of changes for a new development cycle |
| (and all of the major changes) will be merged during this time. |
| |
| The development phase lasts for approximately three months. At the end of this time, |
| the release owner will declare that the development phase is over and releases the first |
| of the release candidates. For the codebase release which is destined to be |
| 3.1.0, for example, the release which happens at the end of the development phase |
| will be called 3.1.0-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to merge |
| new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next release of the |
| code base has begun. |
| |
| Stabilization Phase |
| ******************* |
| |
| Over the next weeks, only patches which fix problems should be submitted to the |
| mainline. On occasion, a more significant change will be allowed, but such |
| occasions are rare and require a TSC approval (Change Control Board). As a |
| general rule, if you miss submitting your code during the development phase for |
| a given feature, the best thing to do is to wait for the next development cycle. |
| (An occasional exception is made for drivers for previously unsupported |
| hardware; if they do not touch any other in-tree code, they cannot cause |
| regressions and should be safe to add at any time). |
| |
| As fixes make their way into the mainline, the patch rate will slow over time. |
| The mainline release owner releases new -rc drops once or twice a week; a normal |
| series will get up to somewhere between -rc4 and -rc6 before the code base is |
| considered to be sufficiently stable and the release criteria have been achieved |
| at which point the final 3.1.0 release is made. |
| |
| At that point, the whole process starts over again. |
| |
| .. _release_quality_criteria: |
| |
| Release Quality Criteria |
| ************************ |
| |
| The current backlog of prioritized bugs shall be used as a quality metric to |
| gate the final release. The following counts shall be used: |
| |
| .. csv-table:: Bug Count Release Thresholds |
| :header: "High", "Medium", "Low" |
| :widths: auto |
| |
| |
| "0","<20","<50" |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| The "low" bug count target of <50 will be a phased approach starting with 150 |
| for release 2.4.0, 100 for release 2.5.0, and 50 for release 2.6.0 |
| |
| |
| |
| Release Milestones |
| ******************* |
| |
| |
| .. list-table:: Release Milestones |
| :widths: 15 25 100 25 |
| :header-rows: 1 |
| |
| * - Timeline |
| - Checkpoint |
| - Description |
| - Owner |
| * - T-5M |
| - Planning |
| - Finalize dates for release, Assign release owner and agree on project wide goals for this release. |
| - TSC |
| * - T-7W |
| - Review target milestones |
| - Finalize target milestones for features in flight. |
| - Release Engineering |
| * - T-4W |
| - Release Announcement |
| - Release owner announces feature freeze and timeline for release. |
| - Release Manager |
| * - T-3W |
| - Feature Freeze (RC1) |
| - No new features, ONLY stabilization and cosmetic changes, bug and doc fixes are allowed. |
| - Release Engineering |
| * - T-2W |
| - 2nd Release Candidate |
| - No new features, ONLY stabilization and cosmetic changes, bug and doc fixes are allowed. |
| - Release Manager |
| * - T-1W |
| - Hard Freeze (RC3) |
| - Only blocker bug fixes, documentation and changes to release notes are allowed. |
| Release notes need to be complete by this checkpoint. Release Criteria is |
| met. |
| - Release Manager |
| * - T-0W |
| - Release |
| - |
| - Release Manager |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Releases |
| ********* |
| |
| The following syntax should be used for releases and tags in Git: |
| |
| - Release [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level] |
| - Release Candidate [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number] |
| - Tagging: |
| |
| - v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number] |
| - v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level] |
| - v[Major].[Minor].99 - A tag applied to main branch to signify that work on |
| v[Major].[Minor+1] has started. For example, v1.7.99 will be tagged at the |
| start of v1.8 process. The tag corresponds to |
| VERSION_MAJOR/VERSION_MINOR/PATCHLEVEL macros as defined for a |
| work-in-progress main branch version. Presence of this tag allows generation of |
| sensible output for "git describe" on main branch, as typically used for |
| automated builds and CI tools. |
| |
| |
| .. figure:: release_flow.png |
| :align: center |
| :alt: Releases |
| :figclass: align-center |
| :width: 80% |
| |
| Zephyr Code and Releases |
| |
| .. _release_process_lts: |
| |
| Long Term Support (LTS) |
| ======================= |
| |
| Long-term support releases are designed to be supported and maintained |
| for an extended period and is the recommended release for |
| products and the auditable branch used for certification. |
| |
| An LTS release is defined as: |
| |
| - **Product focused** |
| - **Extended Stabilisation period**: Allow for more testing and bug fixing |
| - **Stable APIs** |
| - **Quality Driven Process** |
| - **Long Term**: Maintained for an extended period of time (at least 2.5 years) |
| overlapping previous LTS release for at least half a year. |
| |
| |
| Product Focused |
| +++++++++++++++ |
| |
| Zephyr LTS is the recommended release for product makers with an extended |
| support and maintenance which includes general stability and bug fixes, |
| security fixes. |
| |
| An LTS includes both mature and new features. API and feature maturity is |
| documented and tracked. The footprint and scope of mature and stable APIs expands |
| as we move from one LTS to the next giving users access to bleeding edge features |
| and new hardware while keeping a stable foundation that evolves over time. |
| |
| Extended Stabilisation Period |
| +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
| |
| Zephyr LTS development cycle differs from regular releases and has an extended |
| stabilization period. Feature freeze of regular releases happens 3-4 weeks |
| before the scheduled release date. The stabilization period for LTS is extended |
| by 3 weeks with the feature freeze occurring 6-7 weeks before the anticipated |
| release date. The time between code freeze and release date is extended in this case. |
| |
| Stable APIs |
| +++++++++++ |
| |
| Zephyr LTS provides a stable and long-lived foundation for developing |
| products. To guarantee stability of the APIs and the implementation of such |
| APIs it is required that any release software that makes the core of the OS |
| went through the Zephyr API lifecycle and stabilized over at least 2 releases. |
| This guarantees that we release many of the highlighted and core features with |
| mature and well-established implementations with stable APIs that are |
| supported during the lifetime of the release LTS. |
| |
| - API Freeze (LTS - 2) |
| |
| - All stable APIs need to be frozen 2 releases before an LTS. APIs can be extended |
| with additional features, but the core implementation is not modified. This |
| is valid for the following subsystems for example: |
| |
| - Device Drivers (i2c.h, spi.h)... |
| - Kernel (k_*): |
| - OS services (logging,debugging, ..) |
| - DTS: API and bindings stability |
| - Kconfig |
| |
| - New APIs for experimental features can be added at any time as long as they |
| are standalone and documented as experimental or unstable features/APIs. |
| - Feature Freeze (LTS - 1) |
| - No new features or overhaul/restructuring of code covering major LTS features. |
| |
| - Kernel + Base OS |
| - Additional advertised LTS features |
| |
| - Auxiliary features on top of and/or extending the base OS and advertised LTS features |
| can be added at any time and should be marked as experimental if applicable |
| |
| Quality Driven Process |
| ++++++++++++++++++++++ |
| |
| The Zephyr project follows industry standards and processes with the goal of |
| providing a quality oriented releases. This is achieved by providing the |
| following products to track progress, integrity and quality of the software |
| components provided by the project: |
| |
| - Compliance with published coding guidelines, style guides and naming |
| conventions and documentation of deviations. |
| - Regular static analysis on the complete tree using available commercial and |
| open-source tools and documentation of deviations and false positives. |
| - Documented components and APIS |
| - Requirements Catalog |
| - Verification Plans |
| - Verification Reports |
| - Coverage Reports |
| - Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) |
| - SPDX License Reports |
| |
| Each release is created with the above products to document the quality and the |
| state of the software when it was released. |
| |
| Long Term Support and Maintenance |
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
| |
| A Zephyr LTS release is published every 2 years and is branched and maintained |
| independently from the main tree for at least 2.5 years after it was |
| released. Support and maintenance for an LTS release stops at least half a year |
| after the following LTS release is published. |
| |
| .. figure:: lts.svg |
| :align: center |
| :alt: Long Term Support Release |
| :figclass: align-center |
| :width: 80% |
| |
| Long Term Support Release |
| |
| Changes and fixes flow in both directions. However, changes from main branch to an |
| LTS branch will be limited to fixes that apply to both branches and for existing |
| features only. |
| |
| All fixes for an LTS branch that apply to the mainline tree shall be submitted to |
| mainline tree as well. |
| |
| Auditable Code Base |
| =================== |
| |
| An auditable code base is to be established from a defined subset of Zephyr OS |
| features and will be limited in scope. The LTS, development tree, and the |
| auditable code bases shall be kept in sync after the audit branch is created, |
| but with a more rigorous process in place for adding new features into the audit |
| branch used for certification. |
| |
| This process will be applied before new features move into the |
| auditable code base. |
| |
| The initial and subsequent certification targets will be decided by the Zephyr project |
| governing board. |
| |
| Processes to achieve selected certification will be determined by the Security and |
| Safety Working Groups and coordinated with the TSC. |
| |
| |
| Release Procedure |
| ****************** |
| |
| This section documents the Release manager responsibilities so that it serves as |
| a knowledge repository for Release managers. |
| |
| Release Checklist |
| ================= |
| |
| Each release has a GitHub issue associated with it that contains the full |
| checklist. After a release is complete, a checklist for the next release is |
| created. |
| |
| Tagging |
| ======= |
| |
| The final release and each release candidate shall be tagged using the following |
| steps: |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Tagging needs to be done via explicit git commands and not via GitHub's release |
| interface. The GitHub release interface does not generate annotated tags (it |
| generates 'lightweight' tags regardless of release or pre-release). You should |
| also upload your gpg public key to your GitHub account, since the instructions |
| below involve creating signed tags. However, if you do not have a gpg public |
| key you can opt to remove the ``-s`` option from the commands below. |
| |
| .. tabs:: |
| |
| .. tab:: Release Candidate |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| This section uses tagging 1.11.0-rc1 as an example, replace with |
| the appropriate release candidate version. |
| |
| #. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file |
| located in the root of the Git repository to match the version for |
| this release candidate. The ``EXTRAVERSION`` variable is used to |
| identify the rc[RC Number] value for this candidate:: |
| |
| EXTRAVERSION = rc1 |
| |
| #. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using |
| ``release: Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1`` as the commit subject. Merge |
| the PR after successful CI. |
| #. Tag and push the version, using an annotated tag:: |
| |
| $ git pull |
| $ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1" v1.11.0-rc1 |
| $ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0-rc1 |
| |
| #. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``) |
| with a link to the release |
| |
| .. tab:: Final Release |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| This section uses tagging 1.11.0 as an example, replace with the |
| appropriate final release version. |
| |
| When all final release criteria has been met and the final release notes |
| have been approved and merged into the repository, the final release version |
| will be set and repository tagged using the following procedure: |
| |
| #. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file |
| located in the root of the Git repository. Set ``EXTRAVERSION`` |
| variable to an empty string to indicate final release:: |
| |
| EXTRAVERSION = |
| |
| #. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using |
| ``release: Zephyr 1.11.0`` as the commit subject. Merge |
| the PR after successful CI. |
| #. Tag and push the version, using two annotated tags:: |
| |
| $ git pull |
| $ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0" v1.11.0 |
| $ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0 |
| |
| #. Find the new ``v1.11.0`` tag at the top of the releases page and |
| edit the release with the ``Edit tag`` button with the following: |
| |
| * Copy the overview of ``docs/releases/release-notes-1.11.rst`` |
| into the release notes textbox and link to the full release notes |
| file on docs.zephyrproject.org. |
| |
| #. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``) with a link |
| to the release |
| |
| Listing all closed GitHub issues |
| ================================= |
| |
| The release notes for a final release contain the list of GitHub issues that |
| have been closed during the development process of that release. |
| |
| In order to obtain the list of issues closed during the release development |
| cycle you can do the following: |
| |
| #. Look for the last release before the current one and find the day it was |
| tagged:: |
| |
| $ git show -s --format=%ci v1.10.0 |
| tag v1.10.0 |
| Tagger: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org> |
| |
| Zephyr 1.10.0 |
| 2017-12-08 13:32:22 -0600 |
| |
| |
| #. Use available release tools to list all the issues that have been closed |
| between that date and the day of the release. |