Google Git
Sign in
pigweed / third_party / github / zephyrproject-rtos / zephyr / refs/tags/v2.2.0 / . / doc / guides / dts / macros.rst
blob: a69a19bd338e871b129e4d8414ebf14b23d41edd [file] [log] [blame]
.. _dt-macros:
Macros generated from devicetree
################################
This page describes the C preprocessor macros which Zephyr's :ref:`build system
<build_overview>` generates from a :ref:`devicetree`. It assumes you're
familiar with the concepts in :ref:`devicetree-intro` and :ref:`dt-bindings`.
The macros directly generated by the :ref:`devicetree scripts <dt-scripts>` all
start with ``DT_`` and use all-uppercase.
.. _dt-node-identifiers:
Node identifiers
****************
Macros generated from individual devicetree nodes or their properties start
with ``DT_<node>``, where ``<node>`` is a C identifier for the devicetree node.
This section describes the different ``<node>`` values.
.. _dt-node-main-ex:
We'll use the following DTS fragment from the :ref:`FRDM-K64F <frdm_k64f>`
board's devicetree as the main example throughout this section.
.. code-block:: DTS
/ {
aliases {
i2c-0 = &i2c0;
};
soc {
i2c0: i2c@40066000 {
compatible = "nxp,kinetis-i2c";
reg = <0x40066000 0x1000>;
status = "okay";
/* ... */
fxos8700@1d {
compatible = "nxp,fxos8700";
status = "okay";
/* ... */
};
};
};
};
The binding for the "nxp,fxos8700" :ref:`compatible property
<dt-important-props>` contains this line:
.. code-block:: yaml
on-bus: i2c
The generated macros for this example can be found in a build directory for the
:ref:`FXOS8700 sample application <fxos8700>` built for the ``frdm_k64f``
board, in the file :file:`build/zephyr/include/generated/devicetree_unfixed.h`.
Here is part of :file:`devicetree_unfixed.h` showing some of the macros for the
node labeled ``i2c0``. Notice the comment with the node's path in the
devicetree and its dependency relationships with other nodes.
.. code-block:: c
/*
* Devicetree node:
* /soc/i2c@40066000
*
* Binding (compatible = nxp,kinetis-i2c):
* $ZEPHYR_BASE/dts/bindings/i2c/nxp,kinetis-i2c.yaml
*
* Dependency Ordinal: 66
*
* Requires:
* 6 /soc
* ...
*
* Supports:
* 67 /soc/i2c@40066000/fxos8700@1d
*
* Description:
* Kinetis I2C node
*/
#define DT_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000_BASE_ADDRESS 0x40066000
#define DT_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000_SIZE 4096
#define DT_ALIAS_I2C_0_BASE_ADDRESS DT_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000_BASE_ADDRESS
#define DT_ALIAS_I2C_0_SIZE DT_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000_SIZE
#define DT_INST_0_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_BASE_ADDRESS DT_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000_BASE_ADDRESS
#define DT_INST_0_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_SIZE DT_NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000_SIZE
Most macros are generated for individual nodes or their properties. Some macros
are generated for "global" information about the entire devicetree.
In this example, the node identifiers for ``i2c@40066000`` are:
- ``NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000``
- ``ALIAS_I2C_0``
- ``INST_0_NXP_KINETIS_I2C``
In general, the following ``DT_<node>`` macro prefixes are created for each
node.
``DT_(<bus>_)<compatible>_<unit-address>``
The node's compatible property converted to a C identifier, followed by its
:ref:`unit address <dt-unit-address>`. If the node has multiple compatible
strings, the one for its :ref:`matching binding <dt-binding-compat>` is
used.
If the node appears on a bus (and therefore has ``on-bus:`` in its binding,
like ``fxos8700@1d`` does), then the compatible string and unit address of
the bus node is put before the compatible string for the node itself. If
the node does not appear on a bus (no ``on-bus:`` in the binding, like
``i2c@40066000``) then there will be no ``<bus>_`` portion in the node
identifier.
The ``i2c@40066000`` node identifier is ``NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000``:
- there is no ``<bus>_`` portion
- ``<compatible>`` is ``NXP_KINETIS_I2C``, which is its
compatible ``"nxp,kinetis-i2c"`` converted to a C identifier
by uppercasing and replacing non-alphanumeric characters with underscores
- ``<unit-address>`` is ``40066000``
The ``fxos8700@1d`` node identifier is
``NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000_NXP_FXOS8700_1D``:
- ``<bus>`` is ``NXP_KINETIS_I2C_40066000``
- ``<compatible>`` is ``NXP_FXOS8700``
- ``<unit-address>`` is ``1D``
If the node has no unit address, the unit address of the parent node plus
the node's name converted to a C identifier is used for ``<unit-address>``
instead. If the parent node has no unit address either, the name of the
node is used as a fallback.
For example, take this DTS fragment:
.. code-block:: DTS
ethernet@400c0004 {
compatible = "nxp,kinetis-ethernet";
reg = <0x400c0004 0x620>;
status = "okay";
ptp {
compatible = "nxp,kinetis-ptp";
status = "okay";
interrupts = <0x52 0x0>;
};
};
The ``ptp`` node identifier is ``NXP_KINETIS_PTP_400C0004_PTP``:
- there is no ``<bus>_`` portion
- ``<compatible>`` is ``NXP_KINETIS_PTP``
- ``<unit-address>`` is ``400C0004_PTP``, which combines its parent's unit
address and the node's name converted to a C identifier
Here is another example DTS fragment.
.. code-block:: DTS
soc {
temp1 {
compatible = "nxp,kinetis-temperature";
status = "okay";
};
};
The ``temp1`` node identifier is ``NXP_KINETIS_TEMPERATURE_TEMP1``:
- there is no ``<bus>_`` portion
- ``<compatible>`` is ``NXP_KINETIS_TEMPERATURE``
- ``<unit-address>`` is the fallback value ``TEMP1``, because neither
the node nor its parent have a unit address
``DT_INST_<instance-number>_<compatible>``
An instance number for the node, combined with its compatible
converted to a C identifier.
The instance number is a unique index among all enabled
(``status = "okay"``) nodes that have a particular compatible string,
starting from zero.
The ``i2c@40066000`` node identifier in the :ref:`main example
<dt-node-main-ex>` is ``INST_0_NXP_KINETIS_I2C``:
- ``<instance-number>`` is 0 because it was the first node with compatible
"nxp,kinetis-i2c" that the devicetree scripts happened to discover as they
walked the tree
- ``<compatible>`` is ``NXP_KINETIS_I2C``
As another example, if there are two enabled nodes that have ``compatible =
"foo,uart"``, then these node identifiers get generated:
.. code-block:: none
INST_0_FOO_UART
INST_1_FOO_UART
.. warning::
Instance numbers are simple indexes among enabled nodes with the same
compatible. They **in no way reflect** any numbering scheme that might
exist in SoC documentation, node labels or unit addresses, or properties
of the /aliases node.
There is no guarantee that the same node will have the same instance
number between application builds. The only guarantee is that instance
numbers will start at 0, be contiguous, and be assigned for each enabled
node with a matching compatible.
``DT_ALIAS_<alias>``
Generated from the names of any properties in the ``/aliases`` node.
See :ref:`dt-alias-chosen` for an overview.
Here is simple example.
.. code-block:: DTS
/ {
aliases {
uart-1 = &my_uart;
};
my_uart: uart@12345 { /* ... */ };
};
The ``uart@12345`` node identifier is ``ALIAS_UART_1``: ``<alias>`` is
``UART_1`` by uppercasing ``uart-1`` and replacing non-alphanumeric
characters with underscores. The alias refers to ``uart@12345`` using its
:ref:`label <dt-node-labels>` ``my_uart``.
For such a simple concept, dealing with aliases can be surprisingly tricky
due to multiple names which have only minor differences.
For a real-world example, the ``i2c@40066000`` node's alias identifier in
the :ref:`main example <dt-node-main-ex>` is ``ALIAS_I2C_0``:
``<alias>`` is ``I2C_0`` because the property ``i2c-0 = &i2c0;`` in the
``/aliases`` node "points at" ``i2c@40066000`` using its label ``i2c0``.
The alias name ``i2c-0`` is converted to C identifier ``I2C_0``.
The differences between ``i2c-0``, ``&i2c0``, ``i2c0``, and
``i2c@40006000`` in this example are very subtle and can be quite confusing
at first. Here is some more clarification:
- ``i2c-0`` is the *name* of a property in the ``/aliases`` node; this is
the alias name
- ``&i2c0`` is that property's *value*, which is the *phandle* of the
the node with label ``i2c0``
- ``i2c@40006000`` is the name of the node which happens to have label
``i2c0`` in this example
See the devicetree specification for full details.
.. note::
Currently, an older deprecated ``DT_<compatible>_<alias>`` form is also
generated for aliases. For the example above, assuming the compatible
string for the ``&uart1`` node is ``"foo,uart"``, this gives
``DT_FOO_UART_UART_1``.
Work is underway to replace this form with ``DT_ALIAS_*``.
.. _property-macros:
Macros generated for properties
*******************************
Macros for node property values have the form ``DT_<node>_<property>``, where
``<node>`` is a :ref:`node identifier <dt-node-identifiers>` and ``<property>``
identifies the property. The macros generated for a property usually depend on
its ``type:`` key in the matching devicetree binding.
The following general purpose rules apply in most cases:
- :ref:`generic-macros`
- :ref:`phandle-array-macros`
- :ref:`enum-macros`
However, some "special" properties get individual treatment:
- :ref:`reg_macros`
- :ref:`irq_macros`
- :ref:`clk_macros`
- :ref:`spi_cs_macros`
No macros are currently generated for properties with type ``phandle``,
``phandles``, ``path``, or ``compound``.
.. _generic-macros:
Generic property macros
=======================
This section documents the macros generated for non-"special" properties by
example. These properties are handled based on their devicetree binding
``type:`` keys.
In the generic case, the ``<property>`` portion of a ``DT_<node>_<property>``
macro begins with the property's name converted to a C identifier by
uppercasing it and replacing non-alphanumeric characters with underscores. For
example, a ``baud-rate`` property has a ``<property>`` portion that starts with
``BAUD_RATE``.
The table below gives the values generated for simple types. Note that an index
is added at the end of identifiers generated from properties with ``array`` or
``string-array`` type, and that ``array`` properties generate an additional
compound initializer (``{ ... }``).
+------------------+------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| Type | Property and value | Generated macros |
+==================+========================+========================================+
| ``int`` | ``foo = <1>`` | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO 1`` |
+------------------+------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| ``array`` | ``foo = <1 2>`` | | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO_0 1`` |
| | | | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO_1 2`` |
| | | | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO {1, 2}`` |
+------------------+------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| ``string`` | ``foo = "bar"`` | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO "bar"`` |
+------------------+------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| ``string-array`` | ``foo = "bar", "baz"`` | | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO_0 "bar"`` |
| | | | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO_1 "baz"`` |
+------------------+------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| ``uint8-array`` | ``foo = [01 02]`` | ``#define DT_<node>_FOO {0x01, 0x02}`` |
+------------------+------------------------+----------------------------------------+
For ``type: boolean``, the generated macro is set to 1 if the property exists
on the node, and to 0 otherwise:
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_<node>_FOO 0/1
For non-boolean types the property macros are not generated if the binding's
``category`` is ``optional`` and the property is not present in the devicetree
source.
.. _phandle-array-macros:
Properties with type ``phandle-array``
======================================
The generation for properties with type ``phandle-array`` is the most complex.
To understand it, it is a good idea to first go through the documentation for
``phandle-array`` in :ref:`dt-bindings`.
Take the following devicetree nodes and binding contents as an example:
.. code-block:: DTS
:caption: Devicetree nodes for PWM controllers
pwm_ctrl_0: pwm-controller-0 {
label = "pwm-0";
#pwm-cells = <2>;
/* ... */
};
pwm_ctrl_1: pwm-controller-1 {
label = "pwm-1";
#pwm-cells = <2>;
/* ... */
};
.. code-block:: yaml
:caption: ``pwm-cells`` declaration in binding for ``vendor,pwm-controller``
pwm-cells:
- channel
- period
Assume the property assignment looks like this:
.. code-block:: DTS
pwm-user@0 {
status = "okay";
pwms = <&pwm_ctrl_0 1 10>, <&pwm_ctrl_1 2 20>;
pwm-names = "first", "second";
/* ... */
};
These macros then get generated.
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_CONTROLLER_0 "pwm-0"
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_CHANNEL_0 1
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_PERIOD_0 10
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_CONTROLLER_1 "pwm-1"
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_CHANNEL_1 2
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_PERIOD_1 20
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_NAMES_0 "first"
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_NAMES_1 "second"
#define DT_<node>_FIRST_PWMS_CONTROLLER DT_<node>_PWMS_CONTROLLER_0
#define DT_<node>_FIRST_PWMS_CHANNEL DT_<node>_PWMS_CHANNEL_0
#define DT_<node>_FIRST_PWMS_PERIOD DT_<node>_PWMS_PERIOD_0
#define DT_<node>_SECOND_PWMS_CONTROLLER DT_<node>_PWMS_CONTROLLER_1
#define DT_<node>_SECOND_PWMS_CHANNEL DT_<node>_PWMS_CHANNEL_1
#define DT_<node>_SECOND_PWMS_PERIOD DT_<node>_PWMS_PERIOD_1
/* Initializers */
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_0 {"pwm-0", 1, 10}
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_1 {"pwm-1", 2, 20}
#define DT_<node>_PWMS {DT_<node>_PWMS_0, DT_<node>_PWMS_1}
#define DT_<node>_PWMS_COUNT 2
Macros with a ``*_0`` suffix deal with the first entry in ``pwms``
(``<&pwm_ctrl_0 1 10>``). Macros with a ``*_1`` suffix deal with the second
entry (``<&pwm_ctrl_1 2 20>``). The index suffix is only added if there's more
than one entry in the property.
The ``DT_<node>_PWMS_CONTROLLER(_<index>)`` macros are set to the string from
the ``label`` property of the referenced controller. The
``DT_<node>_PWMS_CHANNEL(_<index>)`` and ``DT_<node>_PWMS_PERIOD(_<index>)``
macros are set to the values of the corresponding cells in the ``pwms``
property, with macro names generated from the strings in ``pwm-cells:`` in
the binding for the controller.
The macros in the ``/* Initializers */`` section provide the same information
as ``DT_<node>_PWMS_{CONTROLLER,CHANNEL,PERIOD}(_<index>)``, except as compound
initializers that can be used to initialize C ``struct`` variables.
If a ``pwm-names`` property exists on the same node as ``pwms`` (more
generally, if a ``foo-names`` property is defined next to a ``foo`` property
with type ``phandle-array``), it gives a list of strings that name each entry
in ``pwms``. The names are used to generate extra macro names with the name
instead of an index, like ``DT_<node>_FIRST_PWMS_CONTROLLER`` above.
.. _enum-macros:
Properties with ``enum:`` in the binding
========================================
Properties declared with an ``enum:`` key in their binding generate a macro
that gives the the zero-based index of the property's value in the ``enum:``
list.
Take this binding declaration as an example:
.. code-block:: yaml
properties:
foo:
type: string
enum:
- one
- two
- three
The property ``foo = "three"`` then generates this macro:
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_<node>_FOO_ENUM 2
.. _reg_macros:
``reg`` property macros
=======================
``reg`` properties generate the macros ``DT_<node>_BASE_ADDRESS(_<index>)`` and
``DT_<node>_SIZE(_<index>)``. ``<index>`` is a numeric index starting from 0,
which is only added if there's more than one register defined in ``reg``.
For example, the ``reg = <0x4004700 0x1060>`` assignment in the example
devicetree above gives these macros:
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_<node>_BASE_ADDRESS 0x40047000
#define DT_<node>_SIZE 4192
.. note::
The length of the address and size portions of ``reg`` is determined from
the ``#address-cells`` and ``#size-cells`` properties. See the devicetree
specification for more information.
In this case, both ``#address-cells`` and ``#size-cells`` are 1, and there's
just a single register in ``reg``. Four numbers would give two registers.
If a ``reg-names`` property exists on the same node as ``reg``, it gives a list
of strings that names each register in ``reg``. The names are used to generate
extra macros. For example, ``reg-names = "foo"`` together with the example node
generates these macros:
.. code-block:: c
#define DT_<node>_FOO_BASE_ADDRESS 0x40047000
#define DT_<node>_FOO_SIZE 4192
.. _irq_macros:
``interrupts`` property macros
==============================
Take these devicetree nodes as an example:
.. code-block:: DTS
timer@123 {
interrupts = <1 5 2 6>;
interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
/* ... */
};
intc: interrupt-controller { /* ... */ };
Assume that the binding for ``interrupt-controller`` has these lines:
.. code-block:: yaml
interrupt-cells:
- irq
- priority
Then these macros get generated for ``timer@123``:
.. code-block:: c
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_0 1
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_0_PRIORITY 5
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_1 2
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_1_PRIORITY 6
These macros have the the format ``DT_<node>_IRQ_<index>(_<name>)``, where
``<node>`` is the node identifier for ``timer@123``, ``<index>`` is an index
that identifies the particular interrupt, and ``<name>`` is the identifier for
the cell value (a number within ``interrupts = <...>``), taken from the
binding.
Bindings for interrupt controllers are expected to declare a cell named ``irq``
in ``interrupt-cells``, giving the interrupt number. The ``_<name>`` suffix is
skipped for macros generated from ``irq`` cells, which is why there's e.g. a
``DT_<node>_IRQ_0`` macro and no ``DT_<node>_IRQ_0_IRQ`` macro.
If the interrupt controller in turn generates other interrupts, Zephyr uses a
multi-level interrupt encoding for the interrupt numbers at each level. See
:ref:`multi_level_interrupts` for more information.
There is also hard-coded logic for mapping Arm GIC interrupts to linear IRQ
numbers. See the source code for details.
Additional macros that use names instead of indices for interrupts can be
generated by including an ``interrupt-names`` property on the
interrupt-generating node. For example, this node:
.. code-block:: DTS
timer@456 {
interrupts = <10 50 20 60>;
interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
interrupt-names = "timer-a", "timer-b";
/* ... */
};
generates these macros:
.. code-block:: c
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_TIMER_A 1
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_TIMER_A_PRIORITY 5
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_TIMER_B 2
#define DT_<node>_IRQ_TIMER_B_PRIORITY 6
.. _clk_macros:
``clocks`` property macros
==========================
``clocks`` work the same as other :ref:`phandle-array-macros`, except the
generated macros have ``CLOCK`` in them instead of ``CLOCKS``, giving for
example ``DT_<node>_CLOCK_CONTROLLER_0`` instead of
``DT_<node>_CLOCKS_CONTROLLER_0``.
.. note::
This inconsistency might be fixed in the future.
If a ``clocks`` controller node has a ``"fixed-clock"`` compatible, it
must also have a ``clock-frequency`` property giving its frequency in Hertz.
In this case, an additional macro is generated:
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_<node>_CLOCKS_CLOCK_FREQUENCY <frequency>
.. _spi_cs_macros:
``cs-gpios`` property macros
============================
.. boards/arm/sensortile_box/sensortile_box.dts has a real-world example
Take these devicetree nodes as an example. where the binding for
``vendor,spi-controller`` is assumed to have ``bus: spi``, and the bindings for
the SPI slaves are assumed to have ``on-bus: spi``:
.. code-block:: DTS
gpioa: gpio@400ff000 {
compatible = "vendor,gpio-ctlr";
reg = <0x400ff000 0x40>;
label = "GPIOA";
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <0x1>;
};
spi {
compatible = "vendor,spi-controller";
cs-gpios = <&gpioa 1>, <&gpioa 2>;
spi-slave@0 {
compatible = "vendor,foo-spi-device";
reg = <0>;
};
spi-slave@1 {
compatible = "vendor,bar-spi-device";
reg = <1>;
};
};
Here, the unit address of the SPI slaves (0 and 1) is taken as a chip select
number, which is used as an index into ``cs-gpios`` (a ``phandle-array``).
``spi-slave@0`` is matched to ``<&gpioa 1>``, and ``spi-slave@1`` to
``<&gpiob 2>``.
The output for ``spi-slave@0`` and ``spi-slave@1`` is the same as if the
devicetree had looked like this:
.. code-block:: DTS
gpioa: gpio@400ff000 {
compatible = "vendor,gpio-ctlr";
reg = <0x400ff000 0x40>;
label = "GPIOA";
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <1>;
};
spi {
compatible = "vendor,spi-controller";
spi-slave@0 {
compatible = "vendor,foo-spi-device";
reg = <0>;
cs-gpios = <&gpioa 1>;
};
spi-slave@1 {
compatible = "vendor,bar-spi-device";
reg = <1>;
cs-gpios = <&gpioa 2>;
};
};
See the ``phandle-array`` section in :ref:`generic-macros` for more
information.
For example, since the node labeled ``gpioa`` has property
``label = "GPIOA"`` and 1 and 2 are pin numbers, macros like the following
will be generated for ``spi-slave@0``:
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_<node>_CS_GPIOS_CONTROLLER "GPIOA"
#define DT_<node>_CS_GPIOS_PIN 1
.. _other-macros:
Other macros
************
These are generated in addition to macros generated for :ref:`properties
<property-macros>`.
- :ref:`dt-existence-macros`
- :ref:`bus-macros`
- :ref:`flash-macros`
.. _dt-existence-macros:
Node existence flags
====================
An "existence flag" is a macro which is defined when the devicetree contains
nodes matching some criterion.
Existence flags are generated for each compatible property that appears on an
enabled node:
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_COMPAT_<compatible> 1
An existence flag is also written for all enabled nodes with a matching
compatible:
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_INST_<instance-number>_<compatible> 1
For the ``i2c@40066000`` node in the :ref:`example <dt-node-main-ex>` above,
assuming the node is the first node with ``compatible = "nxp,kinetis-i2c"``,
the following existence flags would be generated:
.. code-block:: c
/* At least one node had compatible nxp,kinetis-i2c: */
#define DT_COMPAT_NXP_KINETIS_I2C 1
/* Instance 0 of compatible nxp,kinetis-i2c exists: */
#define DT_INST_0_NXP_KINETIS_I2C 1
If additional nodes had compatible ``nxp,kinetis-i2c``, additional existence
flags would be generated:
.. code-block:: c
#define DT_INST_1_NXP_KINETIS_I2C 1
#define DT_INST_2_NXP_KINETIS_I2C 1
/* ... and so on, one for each node with this compatible. */
.. _bus-macros:
Bus-related macros
==================
These macros get generated for nodes that appear on buses (have ``on-bus:`` in
their binding):
.. code-block:: none
#define DT_<node>_BUS_NAME "<bus-label>"
#define DT_<compatible>_BUS_<bus-name> 1
``<bus-label>`` is taken from the ``label`` property on the bus node, which
must exist. ``<bus-name>`` is the identifier for the bus as given in
``on-bus:`` in the binding.
.. _flash-macros:
Macros generated from flash partitions
======================================
.. note::
This section only covers flash partitions. See :ref:`dt-alias-chosen` for
some other flash-related macros that get generated from devicetree, via
``/chosen``.
If a node has a name that looks like ``partition@<unit-address>``, it is
assumed to represent a flash partition.
Assume the devicetree has this:
.. code-block:: DTS
flash@0 {
/* ... */
label = "foo-flash";
partitions {
/* ... */
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
boot_partition: partition@0 {
label = "mcuboot";
reg = <0x00000000 0x00010000>;
read-only;
};
slot0_partition: partition@10000 {
label = "image-0";
reg = <0x00010000 0x00020000
0x00040000 0x00010000>;
};
/* ... */
};
These macros then get generated:
.. code-block:: c
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_ID 0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_READ_ONLY 1
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_OFFSET_0 0x0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_SIZE_0 0x10000
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_OFFSET DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_OFFSET_0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_SIZE DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_SIZE_0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_MCUBOOT_DEV "foo-flash"
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_ID 0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_READ_ONLY 1
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_OFFSET_0 0x10000
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_SIZE_0 0x20000
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_OFFSET_1 0x40000
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_SIZE_1 0x10000
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_OFFSET DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_OFFSET_0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_SIZE DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_SIZE_0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_IMAGE_0_DEV "foo-flash"
/* Same macros, just with index instead of label */
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_0_ID 0
#define DT_FLASH_AREA_0_READ_ONLY 1
...
The ``*_ID`` macro gives the zero-based index for the partition.
The ``*_OFFSET_<index>`` and ``*_SIZE_<index>`` macros give the offset and size
for each partition, derived from ``reg``. The ``*_OFFSET`` and ``*_SIZE``
macros, with no index, are aliases that point to the first sector (with index
0).
An ABNF grammar
***************
This section contains an Augmented Backus-Naur Form grammar for the macros
generated from a devicetree. See `RFC 7405`_ (which extends `RFC 5234`_) for a
syntax specification.
.. literalinclude:: macros.bnf
:language: abnf
.. _RFC 7405: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7405
.. _RFC 5234: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5234